The factual inaccuracies/omissions didn't help either. SysadmEnt: "Found this to be pretty one-sided and a bit nit-picky at points. Linux redditors responded with their own thoughts about OS X versus Linux: And each of those individuals being supported by me love the fact that they don't have to upgrade their hardware every two years. I ought to know – any machine I support runs Linux. If Linux distributions had the same level of consumer tech support available that Windows and OS X does, we'd see adoption number exploding. There is also something to be said about having physical media for installing your operating system. Linux also avoids the use of special ID logins to re-install software. Linux on the desktop avoids planned obsolescence and allows the end user to customize their computing experience to meet their needs. This article isn't about which platform is “better.” Instead, it's a matter of which platform is more practical. In this article, I'll explore why I believe Linux is a more practical solution than OS X, if local techs would simply bother to support it. In fact, in some cases, it's completely overkill. Yet it isn't always the most practical operating system for the casual end user. It offers access to pro-level applications that many industries rely on. OS X is a solid operating system for those who enjoy Apple's vision of the ideal desktop.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |